JEBP

  • About
  • Journal’s Board
  • Submission and Instructions to Authors
  • Issues
  • News

ITALIAN ADAPTATION OF THE PARENTAL ATTITUDES SCALES

Giuly Bertoli*1, Giulia Fioravanti1, Carmen Berrocal2, Fiammetta Cosci1

*fiammetta.cosci@unifi.it
1University of Florence, Florence, Italy
2University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

 

Abstract

The present study explored the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Parental Attitude Scales (PAD). The PAD are a 46-item self-report questionnaire that were developed to assess three parental attitudes dimensions: Pleasure-Displeasure, Arousal-Non Arousal, Dominance-Submissiveness.
A total of 483 parents (235 males; mean age = 42.9 ± 6.1 years) completed the PAD as well as measures of theoretically and conceptually related constructs. A sub-sample of 59 participants completed the PAD a second time in order to explore the test-retest reliability.
The results from Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) did not support the original three-factor solution. The three factors explained 22.9% of the total variance; the factor loadings were low, and on the basis of the correlation matrix, many items saturated on more than one factor. Internal consistency was moderately acceptable, temporal stability and concurrent validity was questionable.
The Italian version of the PAD showed weaknesses from a psychometric point of view.

Keywords: parental attitudes, family climate, temporal stability, validity

Published online: 2016/09/01
Published print: 2016/09/01

References
Bishop, D. S., Epstein, N. B., Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster Model of Family Functioning. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 19-31
Burnard, P. (2004). Writing a qualitative research report. Accident and emergency nursing, 12(3), 176-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.11.005
Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting styles as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487- 496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The Mc Master Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9(2), 171-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x
Falender, C. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1980). The emotional climate for children as inferred from parental attitudes: A preliminary validation of three scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 1033-1042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000430
Grandi, S., Fabbri, S., Scortichini, S., & Bolzani, R. (2007). Validazione italiana del Family Assessment Device (FAD)/Italian validation of the Family Assessment Device (FAD). Rivista di psichiatria, 42, 114-122.
Holden, G.W., & Buck, M.J. (2002). Parental attitudes toward childrearing. In: Bornstein, M.H., (Editor). Handbook of parenting: Vol. 3. Being and becoming a parent. 2nd ed. Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ, 537–562.
Holden, G. W., & Edwards, L. E. (1989). Parental attitudes toward child rearing: Instruments, issues, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 29−58.
Horn, J. L. (1965). A Rationale and Test For the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis Psychometrika, 30, 179-85.
Mehrabian, A. (1997). Manual for the PAD Parental Attitudes Scales. Available from Albert Mehrabian, 1130 Alta Mesa Road, Monterey, CA, USA 93940.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS Programs for Determining the Number of Components Using Parallel Analysis and Velicer’s MAP Test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32 (3), 396-402.
Rimehaug, T., Wallander, J., & Berg-Nielsen, T. S. (2011). Group and individual stability of three parenting dimensions. Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health, 5(19), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-5-19.
Russell, J. A., & Mehrabian, A. (1977). Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of Research in Personality, 11, 273-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X
Stogdill, R. M. (1934). Attitudes of parents toward parental behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 29, 293–297.
Terraciano, A., McCrae, R.R, & Costa P.T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 131-141. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.19.2.131
Tremblay, M., Duchesne, S., Vitaro, F., Tremblay, R. E. (2013). Developmental Trajectories of Oppositional Behavior during Elementary School and Their Risk Factors. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jedp.v3n1p234
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1063–1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Zeller, R.A. & Carmines, E.G. (1980). Measurement in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jul 9, 2018Carmen Cotet
SCREENING FOR DISTRESS IN EVERYDAY ONCOLOGY PRACTICEMETACOGNITIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CHILDREN: DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE SERBIAN VERSION
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Categories
  • Vol XIX, No.1, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XIX, No.2, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XX, No.1, 2020 (8)
  • Vol XX, No.2, 2020 (10)
  • Vol XXI, No. 1, 2021 (8)
  • Vol XXI, No. 2, 2021 (11)
  • Vol XXII, No.1, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXII. No.2, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXIII, No.1, 2023, Special Issue (8)
  • Vol XXIII, No.2, 2023 (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.1, 2024, Special Issue (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.2, 2024 (10)
  • Vol XXV, No. 1, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XXV. No.2, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 2, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 1, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVI, No. 2, 2016 (9)
  • About (8)
  • Vol XVII, No. 2, 2017 (10)
  • Vol XVII, No. 1, 2017 (9)
  • Vol XVI, No. 1, 2016 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 2, 2015 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 1, 2015 (12)
  • Vol XIV, No. 2, 2014 (13)
  • Vol XIV, No. 1, 2014 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 2, 2013 (13)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 2a, 2013 (11)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 1a, 2013 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 1, 2013 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 2, 2012 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 1, 2012 (9)
  • Vol XI, No. 2, 2011 (11)
  • Vol XI, No. 1, 2011 (8)
  • Vol X, No. 1, 2010 (9)
  • Vol IX, No. 2, 2009 (8)
  • Vol IX, No. 1, 2009 (9)
  • Vol VIII, No. 2, 2008 (11)
  • Vol VIII, No. 1, 2008 (9)
  • Vol VII, No. 2, 2007 (5)
  • Vol VII, No. 1, 2007 (7)
  • Vol VI, No. 2, 2006 (9)
  • Vol VI, No. 1, 2006 (8)
  • Vol V, No. 2, 2005 (7)
  • Vol V, No. 1, 2005 (6)
  • Vol IV, No. 2, 2004 (3)
Keywords
irrational beliefscbtrebtEditorialdistresscognitive-behavioral therapyappraisalcognitive restructuringschemasautism spectrum disordersbinary model of distressrational emotive behavior theoryconversion disorderautismhypnosispositive illusionstheory of mindearly interventioncommunicationdevelopmentthe Attitudes and Belief Scale 2incompatible information techniquedeficitsneural structurestoddlerscognitive psychologyrational anticipation techniquewithdrawal motivational systemsattributionsfunctional and dysfunctional negative emotionsunitary model of distressmind reading beliefsirrational and rational beliefstreatmenteating behavioursmental healtharousalpre-goal/ post-goal attainment positive emotionsfunctional and dysfunctional emotionscore relational themesapproach motivational systemsdemandingnessdysfunctional consequencesdysfunctional positive emotionspreferences
e-mail us:

jebpeditor@gmail.com

The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Healt

http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro

2017 © Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies