JEBP

  • About
  • Journal’s Board
  • Submission and Instructions to Authors
  • Issues
  • News

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE THREE-DOMAIN DISGUST SCALE IN OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER AND NON-CLINICAL SAMPLES

gulekici09@gmail.com

Esengul Ekici1*, Kadir Ozdel2

1 MD, Memorial Ankara Hospital, Yüksek Ihtisas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Ankara 06520, Turkey, tel.: +90 312 253 6666, email: gulekici09@gmail.com; ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5227-798X
2 MD, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Ankara, Turkey, tel.: +90 312 596 20 00, email: kadirozdel@gmail.com; ORCID iD: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3712-9444

Abstract

The Three-Domain Disgust Scale (TDDS) contains three subscales assessing disgust sensitivity that may contribute to research on developing and maintaining psychopathology and treating psychopathologies related to disgust. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the psychometric properties of the TDDS Turkish version. Two hundred and thirty-six participants responded to the scale consisting of 131 individuals with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and consisting of 105 non-clinical samples. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFAs) and multigroup CFAs were performed to evaluate the factor structure and the measurement invariance across clinically disordered TDDS. Reliability analyses were calculated with Cronbach’s alpha and a one-month retest. Besides, the convergent and discriminant validity of the TDDS were examined with the Beck Depression Inventory, Disgust Scale-Revised, Guilt Inventory, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The study found that the three-factor structure of the TDDS was the best fit for the data, with high item-factor loadings, which proved invariant across clinically disordered. Convergent and discriminative validity of the TDDS was provided, and the reliability analysis results were satisfactory (all ≥ 0.70) in two samples. The TDDS presented high cross-language replicability and seemed an effective instrument for research in Turkish adults.

Keywords: disgust sensitivity, TDDS, validation, reliability, invariance.

Please cite this article as: Ekici, E., & Ozdel, K. (2023). PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE THREE-DOMAIN DISGUST SCALE IN OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER AND NON-CLINICAL SAMPLES. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 23(2), 99-118.

DOI: 10.24193/jebp.2023.2.12

Published online: 2023/09/01
Published print: 2023/09/01

Full text – PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE THREE-DOMAIN DISGUST SCALE IN OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDER AND NON-CLINICAL SAMPLES Download
Sep 29, 2023Carmen Cotet
SELF-OBJECTIFICATION AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING: A SERIAL MEDIATION ANALYSIS ON THE ROLE OF SOCIAL APPEARANCE ANXIETY AND BODY IMAGEPROCRASTINATION AMONG ADULTS: THE ROLE OF SELF-DOUBT, FEAR OF THE NEGATIVE EVALUATION, AND IRRATIONAL/RATIONAL BELIEFS
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Categories
  • Vol XIX, No.1, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XIX, No.2, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XX, No.1, 2020 (8)
  • Vol XX, No.2, 2020 (10)
  • Vol XXI, No. 1, 2021 (8)
  • Vol XXI, No. 2, 2021 (11)
  • Vol XXII, No.1, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXII. No.2, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXIII, No.1, 2023, Special Issue (8)
  • Vol XXIII, No.2, 2023 (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.1, 2024, Special Issue (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.2, 2024 (10)
  • Vol XXV, No. 1, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XXV. No.2, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 2, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 1, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVI, No. 2, 2016 (9)
  • About (8)
  • Vol XVII, No. 2, 2017 (10)
  • Vol XVII, No. 1, 2017 (9)
  • Vol XVI, No. 1, 2016 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 2, 2015 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 1, 2015 (12)
  • Vol XIV, No. 2, 2014 (13)
  • Vol XIV, No. 1, 2014 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 2, 2013 (13)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 2a, 2013 (11)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 1a, 2013 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 1, 2013 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 2, 2012 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 1, 2012 (9)
  • Vol XI, No. 2, 2011 (11)
  • Vol XI, No. 1, 2011 (8)
  • Vol X, No. 1, 2010 (9)
  • Vol IX, No. 2, 2009 (8)
  • Vol IX, No. 1, 2009 (9)
  • Vol VIII, No. 2, 2008 (11)
  • Vol VIII, No. 1, 2008 (9)
  • Vol VII, No. 2, 2007 (5)
  • Vol VII, No. 1, 2007 (7)
  • Vol VI, No. 2, 2006 (9)
  • Vol VI, No. 1, 2006 (8)
  • Vol V, No. 2, 2005 (7)
  • Vol V, No. 1, 2005 (6)
  • Vol IV, No. 2, 2004 (3)
Keywords
irrational beliefscbtrebtEditorialdistresscognitive-behavioral therapyappraisalcognitive restructuringschemasautism spectrum disordersbinary model of distressrational emotive behavior theoryconversion disorderautismhypnosispositive illusionstheory of mindearly interventioncommunicationdevelopmentthe Attitudes and Belief Scale 2incompatible information techniquedeficitsneural structurestoddlerscognitive psychologyrational anticipation techniquewithdrawal motivational systemsattributionsfunctional and dysfunctional negative emotionsunitary model of distressmind reading beliefsirrational and rational beliefstreatmenteating behavioursmental healtharousalpre-goal/ post-goal attainment positive emotionsfunctional and dysfunctional emotionscore relational themesapproach motivational systemsdemandingnessdysfunctional consequencesdysfunctional positive emotionspreferences
e-mail us:

jebpeditor@gmail.com

The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Healt

http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro

2017 © Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies