JEBP

  • About
  • Journal’s Board
  • Submission and Instructions to Authors
  • Issues
  • News

PREDICTORS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN LIE ACCEPTABILITY IN ADOLESCENCE: EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY, CALLOUS UNEMOTIONAL TRAITS AND SOMATIZATION

Iulia Butean1,2, Ionuț Mone3, Laura Visu-Petra3, Adrian Opre5*

1 Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii Str. 37, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
2 Regional Centre for Resources and Educational Assistance, Cluj-Napoca. Tel/Fax +40 264590967, E-mail: iuliabutean@psychology.ro
3 Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii Str. 37, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, E-mail: moneionut@psychology.ro
4 Research in Individual Differences and Legal Psychology (RIDDLE) Lab, Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii Str. 37, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Tel/Fax +40 264590967, E-mail: laurapetra@psychology.ro
5 Department of Psychology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Republicii Str. 37, 400015, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Tel/Fax +40 264590967, E-mail: adrianopre@psychology.ro

Abstract
Lie acceptability is defined as an attitude toward lying that can vary along a continuum, from considering that lying is completely unacceptable, to a most lenient view upon deception. The present research focused on identifying factors associated with individual differences in lie acceptability in a sample of Romanian adolescents (N =167, 14 9 years). We investigated associations between variables with a preliminary documented theoretical and/or empirical association with lie acceptability (callous-unemotional traits or social desirability), along with exploratory age-specific measures of somatization. Our results revealed that male adolescents who displayed high callousness, uncaring, or somatization tended to view lying as more acceptable. Social desirability did not predict lie acceptability above and beyond these individual predictors. The implications of these findings for attempts to reduce problematic deceptive behavior in adolescence are discussed.

Please cite this article as: Butean, I., Mone, I., Visu-Petra, L., & Opre, A. (2020). Predictors of individual differences in lie acceptability in adolescence: Exploring the influence of social desirability, callous unemotional traits and somatization. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 20(2).

Keywords: lie-acceptability, adolescents, callous-unemotional, somatization

Published online: 2020/09/01
Published print: 2020/09/01

Full-Text – Predictors of Individual Differences in Lie Acceptability in Adolescence: Exploring the Influence of Social Desirability, Callous Unemotional Traits and SomatizationDownload

Nov 27, 2020Carmen Cotet
IS THE PROGRESS OF CHILDREN WITH ASD IN A BEHAVIOURAL THERAPY PROGRAMME INFLUENCED BY PARENTS’ HYPER-SYSTEMIZING?A META-ANALYSIS ON THE EFFICACY OF EXPOSURE-BASED TREATMENT IN ANXIETY DISORDERS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DISGUST
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Categories
  • Vol XIX, No.1, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XIX, No.2, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XX, No.1, 2020 (8)
  • Vol XX, No.2, 2020 (10)
  • Vol XXI, No. 1, 2021 (8)
  • Vol XXI, No. 2, 2021 (11)
  • Vol XXII, No.1, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXII. No.2, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXIII, No.1, 2023, Special Issue (8)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 2, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 1, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVI, No. 2, 2016 (9)
  • About (7)
  • Vol XVII, No. 2, 2017 (10)
  • Vol XVII, No. 1, 2017 (9)
  • Vol XVI, No. 1, 2016 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 2, 2015 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 1, 2015 (12)
  • Vol XIV, No. 2, 2014 (13)
  • Vol XIV, No. 1, 2014 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 2, 2013 (13)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 2a, 2013 (11)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 1a, 2013 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 1, 2013 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 2, 2012 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 1, 2012 (9)
  • Vol XI, No. 2, 2011 (11)
  • Vol XI, No. 1, 2011 (8)
  • Vol X, No. 1, 2010 (9)
  • Vol IX, No. 2, 2009 (8)
  • Vol IX, No. 1, 2009 (9)
  • Vol VIII, No. 2, 2008 (11)
  • Vol VIII, No. 1, 2008 (9)
  • Vol VII, No. 2, 2007 (5)
  • Vol VII, No. 1, 2007 (7)
  • Vol VI, No. 2, 2006 (9)
  • Vol VI, No. 1, 2006 (8)
  • Vol V, No. 2, 2005 (7)
  • Vol V, No. 1, 2005 (6)
  • Vol IV, No. 2, 2004 (3)
Keywords
irrational beliefsrebtcbtcognitive-behavioral therapydistressEditorialcognitive restructuringappraisalschemasautism spectrum disordersbinary model of distresshypnosisrational emotive behavior theoryconversion disorderpositive illusionsautismrational anticipation techniqueattributionsincompatible information techniquecognitive psychologydevelopmenttheory of mindcommunicationearly interventiontoddlersneural structuresdeficitsfunctional and dysfunctional emotionsthe Attitudes and Belief Scale 2unitary model of distressarousalfunctional and dysfunctional negative emotionsmind reading beliefseating behavioursmental healthirrational and rational beliefspre-goal/ post-goal attainment positive emotionsdysfunctional consequencesimpairmentcore relational themeswithdrawal motivational systemsapproach motivational systemsdysfunctional positive emotionspreferencesdemandingness
e-mail us:

jebpeditor@gmail.com

The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Healt

http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro

2017 © Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies