JEBP

  • About
  • Journal’s Board
  • Submission and Instructions to Authors
  • Issues
  • News

IRRATIONAL BELIEFS AT COUNTRY LEVEL FUNCTIONING: A CROSS-CULTURAL EXTENSION OF THE COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL MODEL

Monica Bianca BARTUCZ 1,2, Daniel Ovidiu DAVID 2,3,4

daniel.david @ubbcluj.ro

1 Evidence-Based Assessment and Psychological Interventions Doctoral School,
Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2 International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied
Mental Health, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
3 Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babeş-Bolyai University,
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4 Department of Population Health Sciences and Policy at Icahn School of Medicine
at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States

Abstract

At individual level, irrational/dysfunctional beliefs are considered to be one of the important sources of psychological and mental health problems. Despite the fact that the Cognitive – Behavioral Therapy (CBT) model has the potential to explain human functioning at group level, almost no research has investigated if irrational/dysfunctional beliefs could be used to understand the differences between countries in terms of human functioning indicators. Using the methodology employed by cross-cultural research, we aggregated individual scores on two measures of irrationality that we have identified in the 6th wave of the World Values Survey. We combined the two items in a single irrationality index and correlated this index across N = 60 countries with the following aggregated or standalone indicators: national level autonomy, healthy life expectancy, human development, peacefulness, state of democracy, happiness and life satisfaction, as well as secular and emancipative cultural values). Results showed that, mirroring individual level analyses at country level, irrationality negatively correlated with most of these indicators. Almost all associations were in the medium and large effect size intervals. Yet, future studies using instruments with established psychometric properties are needed to verify these relationships and investigate their causal and temporal link. Our findings sustain the hypothesis that beliefs derived from the CBT model can be used to study cross-national differences at country level functioning and sets the stage for a new field of research covering this topic.

Please cite this article as: Bartucz, M. B., & David, D. O. (2019). Irrational beliefs at country level functioning: A cross-cultural extension of the cognitive-behavioral model. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 19(1), 1-26.

Keywords: cross-cultural CBT, irrational beliefs, dysfunctional beliefs,
country-level functioning, cultural values

DOI:10.24193/jebp.2019.1.1

Published online: 2019/03/01
Published print: 2019/03/01

Full-Text- Irrational beliefs at country level functioning: a cross cultural extension of the Cognitive-Behavioral ModelDownload
Sep 26, 2019Carmen Cotet
WHAT IS THE ADVANTAGE OF INTEGRATING DUAL PROCESS THEORIES AND COMPASSION FOCUSED THERAPY? IS THE MERGER A SUITABLE FRAMEWORK TO GAIN INSIGHT ON THINKING PERFORMANCES IN PSYCHOTHERAPY?AN EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS OF MATH ANXIETY QUESTIONNAIRE IN A 5TH-GRADE ROMANIAN SAMPLE – A PRELIMINARY STUDY
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Categories
  • Vol XIX, No.1, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XIX, No.2, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XX, No.1, 2020 (8)
  • Vol XX, No.2, 2020 (10)
  • Vol XXI, No. 1, 2021 (8)
  • Vol XXI, No. 2, 2021 (11)
  • Vol XXII, No.1, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXII. No.2, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXIII, No.1, 2023, Special Issue (8)
  • Vol XXIII, No.2, 2023 (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.1, 2024, Special Issue (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.2, 2024 (10)
  • Vol XXV, No. 1, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XXV. No.2, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 2, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 1, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVI, No. 2, 2016 (9)
  • About (8)
  • Vol XVII, No. 2, 2017 (10)
  • Vol XVII, No. 1, 2017 (9)
  • Vol XVI, No. 1, 2016 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 2, 2015 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 1, 2015 (12)
  • Vol XIV, No. 2, 2014 (13)
  • Vol XIV, No. 1, 2014 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 2, 2013 (13)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 2a, 2013 (11)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 1a, 2013 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 1, 2013 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 2, 2012 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 1, 2012 (9)
  • Vol XI, No. 2, 2011 (11)
  • Vol XI, No. 1, 2011 (8)
  • Vol X, No. 1, 2010 (9)
  • Vol IX, No. 2, 2009 (8)
  • Vol IX, No. 1, 2009 (9)
  • Vol VIII, No. 2, 2008 (11)
  • Vol VIII, No. 1, 2008 (9)
  • Vol VII, No. 2, 2007 (5)
  • Vol VII, No. 1, 2007 (7)
  • Vol VI, No. 2, 2006 (9)
  • Vol VI, No. 1, 2006 (8)
  • Vol V, No. 2, 2005 (7)
  • Vol V, No. 1, 2005 (6)
  • Vol IV, No. 2, 2004 (3)
Keywords
irrational beliefscbtrebtEditorialdistresscognitive-behavioral therapyappraisalcognitive restructuringschemasautism spectrum disordersbinary model of distressrational emotive behavior theoryconversion disorderautismhypnosispositive illusionstheory of mindearly interventioncommunicationdevelopmentthe Attitudes and Belief Scale 2incompatible information techniquedeficitsneural structurestoddlerscognitive psychologyrational anticipation techniquewithdrawal motivational systemsattributionsfunctional and dysfunctional negative emotionsunitary model of distressmind reading beliefsirrational and rational beliefstreatmenteating behavioursmental healtharousalpre-goal/ post-goal attainment positive emotionsfunctional and dysfunctional emotionscore relational themesapproach motivational systemsdemandingnessdysfunctional consequencesdysfunctional positive emotionspreferences
e-mail us:

jebpeditor@gmail.com

The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Healt

http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro

2017 © Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies