JEBP

  • About
  • Journal’s Board
  • Submission and Instructions to Authors
  • Issues
  • News

IMPAIRED EMOTIONAL PROCESSING IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER. ACCURACY VERSUS PROCESSING SPEED

nemes.bogdan@umfcluj.ro

Bogdan Nemeș1*, Horia G. Coman2, Dana C. Herța3,
Raluca N. Trifu4, and Doina M. C. Cozman5

1 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1381-798X
2 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca; 3rd Psychiatry Department, Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-2852
3 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1437-3361
4 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9883-3697
5 Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7102-2432

Abstract

Depression is one of the most frequent conditions within the general population, ranking among the most burdensome in terms of public health expenses, productivity loss and social costs. The condition has been linked with cognitive deficits that may even continue in remission phases, social cognition being one potentially affected cognitive function. In our study, the Penn’s Emotional Acuity Test included in the CogtestTM battery was used to assess emotion recognition accuracy and processing speed. The Structured Clinical Interview for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used to assess the intensity of the symptomatology. A total of 48 depressed individual individuals (65% females), with a mean age of 49.8 ± 10.4 years, and 40 healthy controls (75% females), with a mean age of 35.2 ± 6.9 years were included. As compared to controls, depressive participants recorded significantly less correct answers (9.3 ± 3.8 vs. 11.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.019 – Student’s t test) and slower processing speeds (6795 ± 3366 vs. 4042 ± 1623, p < 0.001 – Mann-Whitney U test) in emotion processing. Furthermore, symptom severity significantly influences only processing speed and not accuracy in emotion recognition tasks. Thus, we conclude that depressive individuals have a significant deficit in processing speed and accuracy when identifying the intensity of other peoples’ emotions.

Keywords: major depressive disorder, emotional processing, social cognition.

Please cite this article as: Nemeș,. B, Coman, H. G., Herța, D. C., Trifu R. N., & Cozman, D. M. C. (2024). IMPAIRED EMOTIONAL PROCESSING IN MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER. ACCURACY VERSUS PROCESSING SPEED. Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies, 24(2), 105-116.

DOI: 10.24193/jebp.2024.2.13

Published online: 2024/09/01
Published print: 2024/09/01

Full textDownload
Aug 30, 2024Carmen Cotet
LONELINESS AND COGNITIVE VULNERABILITY FACTORS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW FOCUSED ON MALADAPTIVE COGNITIONSTHE EFFECTIVENESS OF COMPASSIONATE MIND TRAINING (CMT) FOR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies

Categories
  • Vol XIX, No.1, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XIX, No.2, 2019 (9)
  • Vol XX, No.1, 2020 (8)
  • Vol XX, No.2, 2020 (10)
  • Vol XXI, No. 1, 2021 (8)
  • Vol XXI, No. 2, 2021 (11)
  • Vol XXII, No.1, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXII. No.2, 2022 (9)
  • Vol XXIII, No.1, 2023, Special Issue (8)
  • Vol XXIII, No.2, 2023 (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.1, 2024, Special Issue (9)
  • Vol XXIV, No.2, 2024 (10)
  • Vol XXV, No. 1, 2025 (8)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 2, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVIII, No. 1, 2018 (10)
  • Vol XVI, No. 2, 2016 (9)
  • About (7)
  • Vol XVII, No. 2, 2017 (10)
  • Vol XVII, No. 1, 2017 (9)
  • Vol XVI, No. 1, 2016 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 2, 2015 (9)
  • Vol XV, No. 1, 2015 (12)
  • Vol XIV, No. 2, 2014 (13)
  • Vol XIV, No. 1, 2014 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 2, 2013 (13)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 2a, 2013 (11)
  • Vol XIII, Special Issue 1a, 2013 (7)
  • Vol XIII, No. 1, 2013 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 2, 2012 (8)
  • Vol XII, No. 1, 2012 (9)
  • Vol XI, No. 2, 2011 (11)
  • Vol XI, No. 1, 2011 (8)
  • Vol X, No. 1, 2010 (9)
  • Vol IX, No. 2, 2009 (8)
  • Vol IX, No. 1, 2009 (9)
  • Vol VIII, No. 2, 2008 (11)
  • Vol VIII, No. 1, 2008 (9)
  • Vol VII, No. 2, 2007 (5)
  • Vol VII, No. 1, 2007 (7)
  • Vol VI, No. 2, 2006 (9)
  • Vol VI, No. 1, 2006 (8)
  • Vol V, No. 2, 2005 (7)
  • Vol V, No. 1, 2005 (6)
  • Vol IV, No. 2, 2004 (3)
Keywords
irrational beliefscbtrebtEditorialdistresscognitive-behavioral therapyappraisalcognitive restructuringschemasautism spectrum disordersbinary model of distressrational emotive behavior theoryconversion disorderautismhypnosispositive illusionstheory of mindearly interventioncommunicationdevelopmentthe Attitudes and Belief Scale 2incompatible information techniquedeficitsneural structurestoddlerscognitive psychologyrational anticipation techniquewithdrawal motivational systemsattributionsfunctional and dysfunctional negative emotionsunitary model of distressmind reading beliefsirrational and rational beliefstreatmenteating behavioursmental healtharousalpre-goal/ post-goal attainment positive emotionsfunctional and dysfunctional emotionscore relational themesapproach motivational systemsdemandingnessdysfunctional consequencesdysfunctional positive emotionspreferences
e-mail us:

jebpeditor@gmail.com

The International Institute for the Advanced Studies of Psychotherapy and Applied Mental Healt

http://psychotherapy.psiedu.ubbcluj.ro

2017 © Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies